COTE DE TEXAS: THOUGHTS ON A CORONATION

THOUGHTS ON A CORONATION

Sorry!!  It’s another post about fashion!  I see the comments from those who think I should write only about interior design, but why?  Fashion is an design art just as interior decoration is.  But fear not, I have been writing a new blog story about interior design which I hope to post soon, except fashionable events keep happening!

Onto the main event of the day.

The coronation was a religious affair with glorious music and ancient traditions that seemed both mysterious and interesting to this American.  All the gold and glittering stones, the ancient fabrics, the ermine and velvet – it was a feast for the eyes.

The newly crowned Queen Camilla.

Her dress and coat were custom designed for her with secret messages stitched into the fabric.

If you look closely you will see Camilla’s two dogs are there, among others things.

For the coronation, Camilla wore the crown that was commissioned by Queen Mary, great grandmother of Charles, who wore it in her own coronation in 1911. 

This marks the first time a consort has used a previously designed crown – in the past, a new one was always commissioned for the ceremony. Queen Mary’s crown was changed and simplified for Camilla.  

 

At her coronation in 1911, Queen Mary is shown with her crown.  In order to simplify the crown’s profile for Camilla,  its eight arches were reduced down to just four.  The main diamond  was removed because the crown contained the Koh I Noor diamond.  This diamond is controversial due to its history.  It is said to have been looted by Iran from Dehli.  Later an Afghan general sold the diamond to a Sikh ruler.  When Britain annexed Punjab in 1849 England took the Koh I Noor diamond and gave it to Queen Victoria.  Its ownership today is challenged and thus, different parts of the Cullinan diamond replaced the Koh I Noor diamonds in Queen Mary’s crown.

I like the new simpler design, but is it too simple? I think it needs 8 arches, not four.  But no one asked me.  For sure the newly revised crown does look more delicate and it is still quite beautiful.

Queen Mary’s crown before it was changed.  The Kor I Noor diamonds – the huge center stone and one below it and the top pear shaped stone. 

The Koh I Noor and Cullinan diamonds were put into the crowns so that they could easily be removed and used as jewelry.  Crystal copies of the stones were made and placed into the crowns.

The Queen often wore two Cullinan diamonds as a brooch.  The piece was a favorite of Queen Mary’s and the family referred to her beloved diamonds as “Granny’s Chips.”

Here you can see the newly revised crown with the three Cullinan diamonds, two center bottom, one center top.

 

Most amazing are the last three custom coronation crowns:  Queens Alexandra, Mary, and the Queen Mum.

The Queen Mum and Mary’s crowns are so similar you wonder why she had her own crown made? 

And now, with the changes in arches, why wouldn’t Camilla just use the Queen Mum’s crown?  The Queen Mum was such a tiny woman, perhaps the crown was just too small for Camilla.

And there were more jewels at the coronation, especially the necklace:

The Coronation Necklace is stunning.  It was made for Queen Victoria in 1858 and all future Queens have worn it at their coronations:  Alexandra 1902, Mary 1911, Elizabeth, Queen Mum 1937 and finally Elizabeth in 1953.  The smaller stones came from various other jewelry – but the large center pendant was gifted to Queen Victoria after it had been removed from the treasury of present day Pakistan, then Lahore. 

Being crowned.

Queen Camilla!  Leaving the church, trying to avoid all the water.  I do wonder – why is there not a red carpet at the church entrance so that the dresses and robes don’t drag on the sidewalk?  And even in the church, the long dresses could use a carpet going up the aisle.

 

The King wore two crowns.  On the left is the St. Edward’s Crown used only when crowning a king or queen.  Charles will never wear this crown again – and he wore it only once on his coronation day. Later in the coronation he changed crowns to the lighter and smaller Imperial State Crown.

 

The St. Edward’s crown was made for Charles II in 1661!!!  It has 444 various stones.  The 1661 crown is actually a copy of the medieval crown made for Edward the Confessor in 1042.  Amazing. It has been worn by only 17 sovereigns. 

 

After the crowning ceremony, the King changed into the more familiar Imperial State Crown.  It has 3000 various stones with its center stone the Cullinan II, a 317 carat diamond. The diamond was cut from a diamond weighing 3,601 carats in 1905 and it was given by the now South Africa to Edward VII on his birthday.

Close up of the Imperial State Crown.  The eldest royal stone is the Stuart sapphire which is at the top center of the crown.  Another amazing stone is the Black Prince’s Ruby thought to be worn by Henry V.  And of course there is the huge Cullinan II diamond weighing over 300 carets. 

*** 

The coronation was emotional even if you aren’t a royalist.  The music!  Charles picked most of the music for Harry and Meghan’s wedding, so I assume he did the same for his coronation.   The aria commissioned for the event was so powerful – I literally got chills and started sobbing like a babe when it was sung.

From South Africa, Pretty Yende sang the newly composed piece entitled Sacred Fire.  Yende looked like a flower in her bright yellow dress.  She was almost as gorgeous as the aria.  And the jewels?  They were real!

I especially enjoyed Handel’s Zadok the Priest.  Incredibly moving.  But of course I kept thinking of Zadok the Jeweler, a popular shop in Houston!!

The piece was first heard in 1727, at Westminster Cathedral for George II’s coronation, see the engraving above.  Zadok has been played at every coronation since.

Zadok in Hebrew means righteous, justified.  He was a descendant from Eleazer, the son of Aron.  He was a Kohen – a high priest of Israel during the David and Solomon reigns.

I, I must confess, am also a Cohen, a high priestess.  OK.  LOL. 

But it’s true.

In all seriousness, those with the name Cohen have certain duties in the Judaic religion along with archaic rules.  My brother died in Israel and they would not allow my father to visit the grave because he was a Cohen.  He had to stand by the side of the drive.

***

Back to the Coronation

Another moment that brought emotional tears was the Prince of Wales pledging his fealty to his father King Charles III.   All I could think was I wished his mother was here to see him.

 

Conversely, I was glad Diana wasn’t there to see this – Harry all alone and forgotten.  It’s all so pathetic – basically for writing a biography about his own life that was mostly non controversial.  A few lines here and there, taken out of context, were blasted by the press claiming Harry was such a leper for writing the book.  But stop.  Diana had a ghostwriter write the most horrid things about the royals, including Charles and Camilla, et al.  And now she is lionized.  Even Charles has written things about his lonely childhood and his poor relationship with his father.

I think if reporters actually read Spare instead of screaming about out of context sentences,  maybe Harry might be allowed to sit with his brother, or have lunch with the family.

While Harry tried to keep a smile on his face – and he did, mostly, this photo  catches him looking at his brother wondering where did it all go so wrong?

This photo kills me. 

Apparently after the coronation there was a lunch and the King raised a toast to his unknown grandson Archie on his birthday “wherever he is.”

Wow.  Shady.

The two outcasts walk in.  Harry in his medals which he was allowed to keep and Prince Andrew in his robe.

MOVING ON!!

Since Queen Victoria and Queen Elizabeth lived such long lives – there haven’t been that many English coronations in recent times.

 

Queen Victoria in her coronation finery.  She became Queen at just 18 years old, the coronation was a year later.

Victoria at Westminster.  Notice the same gold plates and various items on the altar as they were at Charles’ coronation. Notice at the back left, the men holding up their coronets.  Most were in ermine and velvet robes.

Victoria’s coronation benefited from the advent of the railways which brought over 400,000 revelers to London.  There was a fairground which was to last for two days and instead lasted four.

But, the lack of any rehearsal made for a coronation that was fraught with errors and mishaps.  Her coronation would be the last one that was so poorly planned.

Victoria’s son, King Edward VII, who like Charles,  waited a long time to be crowned.  He was 59 at his coronation.  His long suffering wife, Queen Alexandra of Denmark, was almost completely deaf. Edward was a notorious cheat but his last mistress is an interesting one.  Alice Keppel was just 29 when she became attached with Edward, aged 59.  She was accepted as his mistress by even Alexandra who allowed her on Edward’s deathbed.  For a short while, that is.  Years later, Alice Keppel’s great granddaughter would meet her own Prince of Wales – Charles, whose great great grandfather was Edward VII. 

What a small world.

Notice the jewels Alexandra wore to the coronation.  There was barely an inch on her body that wasn’t covered in diamonds.

King George V and Queen Mary. Notice he is wearing buckled shoes like Charles did.  Camilla wore just one of her diamond necklaces, which Mary preferred to stack up her neck like a choker.

Their 1911 coronation was the first ever to be photographed.  They were seated in front of the royal box.  Notice the ceremonial gold plates, et al, behind the clergy.

King George VI and Queen Elizabeth, 1937

The King who was not born to be king, but stepped in when his brother Bertie, Edward VIII, abdicated to marry the divorced American Wallis Simpson.  And now today, as King Charles is crowned with his Queen,  a divorcee whose ex husband was at the coronation.  Times have changed!  The Queen Mum’s robe is interesting with what was probably bright flowers sewn on the velvet.

Their daughters Elizabeth and Margaret both attended as did the Dowager Queen Mary.  This was the first time a dowager Queen attended a coronation.

Queen Elizabeth 1953

This was the first to be televised worldwide.  Prince Philip helped plan and organize the coronation, but when a ceremony is 1000 years old – it’s hard to modernize.  Notice how many ladies in waiting Elizabeth had at her side.  Camilla had two and one was her sister.   Queen Elizabeth’s coronation had over 8,000 guests, while Charles had 2,000 plus. 

Everything was streamlined at Charles coronation,  but it just wasn’t noticeable.  Except for this:  Tiaras, velvet robes, and coronets were banned.  Forty eight hours before the coronation King Charles rescinded the ban as he had gotten many complaints.  Although I still didn’t notice any tiaras or coronets.

A coronet is a small crown that denotes your rank: 

Marquess, duke, earl, duchess, viscountess, marchioness, countess, viscount, baroness, and baron each had their own identifying coronet.

In past coronations, all House of Lords members were invited, all wore ermine and velvet robes and their correct coronet.  But this coronation was different.  The House of Lords who were always invited to the coronations were missing this time around. 

 

Here at Queen Elizabeth’s coronation, the peerage all sat together.  The pearls on the coronet look like pen lights.

Besides cutting the number of guests attending from 8000 to 2000 plus, the size of the procession around London in the gold carriage was also shortened.  Although it seemed as if every soldier was at the parade, there were only 6,000 compared to his mother’s coronation where she had 40,000 plus troops.

Despite all the changes and downsizing – the coronation was moving, emotional and awe inspiring. 

At the same time, I had mixed emotions watching it.

I was wondering how long the monarchy will last.  Will William be crowned?  Probably?  George?  That’s a tough one.  The world is so different today.  There is no mystery about the royals.  We know they are mortals and flawed ones at that.  Would I ever want to bow down to a mortal man?  When you start dissecting it, it all seems silly.  But who really knows?  Maybe George’s child will rule one day.

Images like this highlight how ancient the ceremony is. 

But this.  This was so emotional.  I kept wondering – what is Harry thinking right now?????

This image was awe inspiring and yet…what is going on?????  Do I think he, a mortal man, is being anointed with holy oil blessed by God??   Did God choose him to be King?  We all know that Charles from the very luckiest of gene pools.  That’s my opinion. 

Despite being an American not wanting to bow down to the King – I think he’s an incredible man.  What he has done to the environment decades before it was chic is amazing.  I admire his love of classic architecture and music.  The King is an accomplished artist and water colorist.   He is so interesting and funny and at the same time he can have a wicked temper.  And he can act entitled.  Somehow I don’t think a King George would ever feel entitled.

William has some tall boots to live up to.  Does he have any passions like his father?  I honestly don’t know what he is passionate about.  He has admitted he doesn’t care about architecture like his father and I don’t think he’s an artist.  Music?  He seems to care about charity work like his mother, but he is obviously not as well rounded as Charles. The King is a real Renaissance Man.  He reminds me most of Prince Albert who did so much for England in such a short time.

Without a doubt, this is a couple in love.  Soul mates.  Why they didn’t marry first is beyond me – it’s so obvious they were meant to be together.

There are the gold plates again.  They are so gorgeous. Charles’ robe is from his grandfather, King Edward’s 1902 coronation.

Before he is crowned, the King in deep reflection.  He’s been training his entire life for this but it still must be daunting to think of the responsibility that will now be on his shoulders alone.

At Camilla’s side are her two companions:  her sister, the very talented interior decorator Annabel Elliot, and her friend, Lady Lansdowne. 

The Princess of Wales didn’t wear a tiara but instead had a crown of crystal leaves which I loved.

          

Mini Me Charlotte wore a smaller version of the headband.  Is she not the absolutely most adorable little girl in the world?  She would make a perfect Queen, but she wasn’t born first.   Charlotte was in charge of  Prince Louie, who was adorable in a miniature version of his father’s uniform.  Unfortunately, Louis was perfectly behaved this time, unlike at the Jubilee when he was so cheeky, as they say in England.

Lord President of the Council, Penny Mordaunt, carrying the Sword of State.  The press called her the Pippa of the coronation recalling how Kate’s sister Pippa stole the show at their wedding because she looked so beautiful in her bridesmaid’s dress. 

Close up – I especially loved the the embroidery on her hat and cape.

Here is Pippa Middleton at the coronation in lemon sorbet.  At her left is her and Kate’s brother.  Pippa never looks bad.  She is such a natural beauty.

The Royal Family had quite a few best dressed.  Lady Louise of Windsor, Edward’s daughter, was outstanding.  From a duckling to a swan – her transformation was sudden and amazing!  She was always a young girl, but at the coronation, she suddenly was a young woman.  She looks like all the Windsor women.  And look how beautiful her profile is. 

Another huge surprise was Lady Margarita Armstrong-Jones, the daughter of Lord Linley (behind her) and the granddaughter of Princess  Margaret.  She’s another classic Windsor beauty and her dress was beyond wonderful in blush.

 

Another view – even her shoes were perfect.

The Duke and Duchess of Kent’s daughter, Lady Helen Taylor was lovely.  She is always fashion forward.  Her shoes!!!  Dress by Dior.

Prince and Princess Michael’s daughter, Lady Gabriella Kingston, another fashion forward royal cousin, was model perfect in bright pink.  Her brooch is a fourth generation piece.

Lady Sarah Chatto,  Princess Margaret’s daughter looked lovely in cream with  matching purse.  Her jewelry was from her mother.

Zara Tindall, The Princess Royal Anne’s daughter is another fashionista that rarely misses. 

Her brooch was a gift from Charles to his sister Anne on her marriage.

 

Crown Princess Marie Chantal of Greece.  Yes, another fashionista!  In another pale blue dress.  Notice her purse that looks like a book!  Handsome husband.

The Macrons.  Best dressed couple of the coronation.  Blush dress with matching coat. Louis Vuitton.   Stunning.

Former British Prime Minister David Cameron and his wife Samantha.  I LOVED her dress.  It was a flouncy, spring silk dress with a summery hat.  Love the sleeves.  Best Dressed.

 

Another view.  She is so cute!

Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani and Jawaher bunt Hamad bin Suhail Al-Thani.  Dior.  Another beautiful couple.

Wow!  First Minister of Scotland Humza Yousaf and wife Nadia El-Nakala in Scottish dress.  LOVE!

Go Outlander!!!

King Jigme Kesar Namgyal Wangchuk and Queen Jetson Pema, Bhutan.  Love at first sight – Jigme waited for her to come of age to marry.  Seriously the cutest royal couple!!!

Queen Rania of Jordan is another one who never misses.  Another lemon sorbet dress.

First Lady Jill Biden in matching blue gloves and a ribbon on her head.  Finnegan Biden, her granddaughter (yes, Hunter’s daughter) in yet another lemon sorbet dress with cape.

King Vajiralongkorn of Thailand and Queen Suchinda of Thailand in traditional dress, both looked great.  The King and I!  His medals are especially impressive.  Hers too.

 

Prime Minister Trudeau and Sophie.  Another blush dress.  Cute.

LOVE!  Best dressed – Katy Perry.  You can’t see here, but the back had a ruffled pelmet.

She came to be noticed and she was.  Ms Rose Hanbury, 39,  married to David Rocksavage, 62, the Marquess of Cholmondeley.  Rocksavage held an important ceremonial position for Queen Elizabeth.   They are neighbors of the Wales near the Sandringham estate on the coast.  It has long be rumored that Rose and Prince William are/were an item.  Her presence caused all kinds of twitter chatter.  Especially her shoes, which Kate had worn the night before.  So silly.  Her husband was one who wore his ceremonial robes to the event, but not his coronet.  Regardless, I loved her look.  And I don’t believe the rumors.

 

Prince Albert and Charlene.  Hmm.  She is usually fashion forward and impeccable but this wasn’t her best look to date.

 

King Felipe of Spain and Queen Letizia of Spain wearing a Carolina Herrera dress.  Not sure why, but not a favorite.  Her hat looks like a lampshade.  It’s rare she’s not the best dressed.

This one kills me.  My favorite royals from Denmark, Crown Prince Frederik and Princess Mary.   Maybe it’s the deep purple, my least favorite color in the world.  And paired with turquoise jewels, I just didn’t care for her outfit.  But, like I said – they are my favorite royal couple!

Bye, for now.  It’s sad to think, but I don’t know what big state occasion is coming up soon.  Lady Louise is too young to marry, but she might be the next wedding?   All the great grandchildren of Queen Elizabeth are too young to marry right now and in the next decade.  There won’t be any jubilees soon, maybe in ten years.  So, unless I am wrong, it might be a long time before we see a British celebration on a grand scale again – except for the occasional funeral.   We’ve gotten spoiled lately:  there was Harry and Meghan’s wedding,  Eugenie’s wedding, Beatrice’s Covid slimmed down wedding,  Prince Philip’s funeral, the Jubilee, and the Queen’s funeral.

It’s been a busy two or three years for the Royals, but it might, unfortunately, be awhile before we see them all out and together again soon.

98 comments :

  1. Leave any corrections I might have missed!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rose Hanbury's heels are the Aquazzura brand that Meghan wore when she was still in the family. Kate wore them last week and I couldn't tell if she was trying to include Meghan symbolically or get up her nose (as the Brits say). Interestingly, the Black Prince's Ruby is not a ruby at all, but rather a cabochon red spinel. Also, the Daily Mail (so take that 'source' for what it's worth) reported Lady Pamela Hicks was not invited to the ceremony because her father Lord Mountbatten persuaded the Queen not to allow Charles to marry Camilla way back when.

      Your coverage was spot on -- and I was very touched by your remarks about Harry. He deserved better treatment. If Charles wants to hold the Commonwealth together, he would be aided in a more visibly diverse family.

      Loved the article - and YES fashion is design. So keep it coming!

      Delete
    2. There is an interesting story about the spinel. There’s a gash in it. I’ve forgotten the details but there’s a wonderful doc with the queen talking about the crown. I think the shoes is just shoes. !

      Delete
  2. I can't wait for William to be king....when i look at charles and camilla I think of that saying; "I guess this means there's hope for all side-chicks out there."....I liked seeing the fashions you posted, though!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. You voiced so many of my own thoughts! Especially about Harry. Thanks for another great summary!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you so much for all the good fashion photos! We never miss watching a royal occasion and it’s fun to see what the attendees are wearing. Even the women of a certain age are in stilettos! I can’t remember when I last wore a heel like that much less walked and stood in them for hours. I appreciate all the historical context you provided for the royal garments. Fun! The monarchy does provide continuity but feels more and more anachronistic and superfluous in some ways.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Princess Michael was having an awfully hard time in here sensible low heels. She has either hip or feet problems. I could never do all that in heels. Even low ones !!

      Delete
  5. Rose Hanbury & the Marquess of Cholmondeley's son, Lord Oliver Cholmondeley (age 13) was a page of honour along with Prince George and helped manage the King's robes.
    The handsome man with Crown Princess Marie-Chantal is her husband, Crown Prince Pavlos.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I had so much to write about I just stopped at all the pages. I didn’t know that was Roses son!!! The rumors must not be true. But who knows? Charles may be sympathetic to William if they are. I just don’t believe them.

      Delete
    2. The rumor about Rose isnt true! It was made up by a writer who actually later admitted it was made up, but certain people take it to their advantage to ignore the part about it being fake. (I could give you his name, but maybe you dont want me to put it here. Its public info-google it.) It was immediately picked by a certain eager group who love the lie and have perpetuated it. A blogger in the U.S. was super big in spreading it and it went like wildfire among the Suffolk fans who spread hate everyday about Will and Kate.

      Delete
    3. Hmmm. It is said the the haiddresser of Meghan heard the rumor and spread it around. Of course if was Meghan.

      Delete
    4. Giles Coren

      Delete
    5. https://www.thecut.com/2023/05/who-is-rose-hanbury-marchioness-of-cholmondeley.html

      Delete
    6. "The Cut" magazines bias does not lean towards the Royal family.

      Delete
  6. Thank you for all your fabulous comments! I am a royal bio devourer, but did not watch the coronation, but now want to, thanks to your commentary! I loved it!

    ReplyDelete
  7. As I started reading this, I'd hoped you would identify who I now know is Penny Mourdant. Thank you! And in the ceremony itself, she wore nude heels. She definitely stole the show for me in her classic, fits-like-a-glove ensemble. Wonderful post. Thank you for all the fashion detail! And will you look at those gorgeous arches in the feet of Crown Princess Marie Chantal of Greece!?!! As for the ceremony, all I could think about was how closely Cathollic it all was (such pomp and circumstance), except for the allowance of divorce. And I kept wondering how beautiful Princess Diana would have looked as Queen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. But didn’t you find Marie Chantal a little sour? She wasn’t smiling when I saw her. But yes. She looked beautiful and those feet are beautiful as is she in general.

      Delete
    2. I've never heard of anyone's foot arches being described as gorgeous, or even ever noticed them in my entire life. That was humorous-for me anyway...ha!

      Delete
    3. Go look. She has beautiful feet. Just like moi.

      Delete
    4. Gosh, this is funny. I've never in my entire long life concentrated on the looks of another woman's feet. I've coveted their hair, legs, and beauty in general on occasion, but feet, well, they have never entered my mind at all. Weird. Sounds like a fetish...ha!

      Delete
  8. Thanks for posting this informative piece. Your fashion posts are equally as good as your design posts.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I feel too that Camilla and Charles were meant for each other…
    However I don’t believe that Queen Elizabeth should have changed long standing rules for him. He should have been overlooked as King and it should have passed to William who has shown exemplary behavior.
    Queen Camilla?? Now she has the same title as Queen Elizabeth, really?
    Cheating on his wife, Who else will he cheat? Poor character is poor character.
    Not a fan at all

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hear you. I think she should have remained a friend. But they were made for each other. Diana is rolling over somewhere. The royals did not treat her fairly and I think thsat is at the root of Harry’s problem too.

      Delete
    2. I believe Harry needs serious medical help, not just his magic mushrooms and hippy Cali hoodoo.

      Delete
  10. I enjoyed the coronation. I'm sure this is a unusual idea, somehow I think the crowns would be much more beautiful without the velvet insert. The fashion was amazing. You highlighted many beautiful looks. I thought Olena Zelensky was classic and appropriately simple considering her county's strife. I'm afraid I disagree a little on the Harry treatment - to me he stepped back so he can't be treated the same even though he is a Prince. I thought his place was more reflective of his new role than from the book. But I tend to ignore most of what the media goes on about. Lovely post Joni, enjoyed it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I meant to show Olga’s photo but it got lost? Strange! Thanks for the comments!

      Delete
  11. Joni, your post was so fun to read. . The history, the coronation and the guests and their BEAUTIFUL clothes. I would never been able find all the photos or know who they are. Thank you!!!
    Julie in Fort Worth

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'm amazed at your in-depth research in such a very brief turn-around time. Thank you once again for another brilliant piece.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Such a lovely post to read! As an American, I can't get enough of this spectacle and tradition. A few thoughts:

    Would love your thoughts on the king's equerry: Lt. Col Johnny Thompson - he always steals the show in my book! I love trying to spot him. Given his longstanding jobs with the royal family, he is surely close with the entire family. I'd love to get more candid glimpses of him and the Wales children - you know he looks out for them!

    I've always liked Sophie, but she continues to get better and better in her role. She seems regal, warm, professional and fun all at the same time. What a great addition to that family.

    Did anyone else expect to see the Waleses seated prior to the procession? I heard talks of them arriving late; it was odd Charles and Camilla arrived first. Perhaps the plan was for the Wales to trail in the procession all along, but I do think the intent was for them to enter into the abbey first. I want more details on the white gowns (like Kate wore) under the ornamental robes. They looked very ornate!

    The Wales family is stunning. Kate seems born for her role. While I have a lot of respect for Charles and Camilla, I think William and Kate will be a beloved reign that will garner historical interest for years to come. I feel lucky to be living parallel in their era!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No one knows what happened with Charles arriving first. He seemed agitated. Not that I don’t blame him. Maybe the heir walks after the king? Can’t wait to hear the true story about that !

      Delete
    2. What happened is Charles' horses were too quick and he arrived 5 minutes or so early-the Waleses were not late-Charles was early. Charles is not a patient person and does not suffer these incidences well. Hence the 'pen incident'. He's impatient and/or wants things to go perfectly. The Waleses were supposed to be there before Charles.

      Delete
    3. Col. Johnny is a right hunk, and is drooled over on lots of the blogs every time he is spotted in the background! Calm down, ladies! The handsome equerry is married and has a little one.

      Delete
    4. Lovely post - loved seeing the fashion photos. One question —- why did our President not attend? There were so many heads of state there —- his absence seems awkward!

      Delete
    5. Biden did not attend as he and the group he panders to do not want the Monarchy to continue-neither do they approve of Brexit.

      Delete
    6. The reports are sayin the William and kate were late. The horses are timed to prercision. No way they were five minutes early. Biden didn't go because President's don't go to coronations. Ever.

      Delete
    7. The reports, on the day, not in retrospect, said that Charles was early. This timng was all written down and was known. They knew what time Charles was to arrive and he was aprox. 6 minutes or so EARLY.

      Delete
  14. I adore this post! Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Fashion IS design for one's body and interior design IS fashion for one's home - both are meant to bring pleasure, comfort and even function ... and I thoroughly enjoyed your coverage. However, I was disappointed that the President of the United States was not in attendance. I looked at all your photos of the other heads of state - those who were married were often seen holding the hand of their spouse - yet our first lady was there with a grandchild ... it's not as though there is a crisis at home which required the President to stay behind ... and it's 'poppycock' to say it was because he required more security and safety measures than any of the other dignitaries in attendance - I think it's a sad commentary and more than that ... I find it astounding that I heard next to no mention of his absence ... or did I miss that? Again, YOUR commentary was stellar! I always enjoy yours posts and relish reading them more than once.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Biden does not like the monarchy. He is part of the larger word-wide cabal that want to get rid of it. Plus he probaby would have said something embarrassing on foreign soil again which would have been widely televised this time what with all the Coronation coverage.

      Delete
    2. You are the embarrassment.

      Delete
    3. Excuse me, but it is not a real secret about Biden, the Monarchy and Brexit. And his gaffes are certainly no secret either! You aren't keeping up perhaps...

      Delete
    4. Remeber we fought a war against the King and won????? No president has ever attended a coronation of the English monarch. Of course Joe wasn't going to break precedent. Imagine what Fox would say about him if he had?????

      Delete
  16. Thank you for the detailed commentary. I learned more about who was who from your port. My daughter is studying in London and I passed it on for her to read. She learned some things too!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks! There are a lot of great royal blogs for her to read and how great she can tour all the places there! Jealous!!!

      Delete
  17. I love the international flavor of an event like this. When else do you get to see so many royals, rulers, and heads-of-state in one place? And all of them looking their best. My favorite picture was the one of the minister of Scotland and his wife. Having a Scottish minister with the name of Yousaf who wears a kilt (and beautifully so!) makes me optimistic for the future. It shows we really can all get along and continue to evolve into a better world for everyone. Thanks for another great post with so many nice photos. The only couple missing was Japan's emperer and empress Masako. Did they attend?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. But I just had to edit thinks. I hadn't intended to write this so then I was rushing. Someone asked me about Beatrice and Eugenie and I just ugh. They had lunch last week with Piers Morgan. What an act of betrayal to Harry, their close friend. Then Piers turns up sitting one seat over from the King. WTF is going on with him? He was fired for what horrible things he said against Harry and Meghan. I just don't get it. at all. except it proves what Harry said. The family leaks.

      Delete
  18. It was a beautiful event. But 'Queen Camilla' leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Agree with prior comment, he should have had to give up the throne to William, or stayed married to Diana. Yes, he was forced into his first marriage and his parents were at fault, but rules were followed by so many before him. I simply don't think he should have been allowed to cheat on his wife, marry his mistress and retain the crown.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In that case, he would have stayed married to his wife but I'm guessing they both would have continued to cheat. That's not really a good solution either, is it?

      Delete
    2. The solution is not marry Camilla or marry her and don't crown her queen.

      Delete
  19. Thank you, Joni, for the lovely commentary. I really enjoyed the explanations concerning the Crown Jewels. My favorites in the fashion sector were not the same as yours. However, I appreciated what you had to say. Love being a part of cotedetexas!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks!!! I love the comments. They've always been a little controversial because I don't censor them. IN the old days, wars would break out. So many left comments. now its so different.

      Delete
    2. I used to start a lot (most maybe...ha!) of those wars in the old days. I wasn't trying but apparently my opinions are controversial...ha! And I love a good back and forth! It appears that there isn't anyone here these days (besides you, Joni...hee!) who cares to have a 'discussion.'

      Delete
  20. Reporters aren't in control of where The Spare sits or whether or not he stays to have lunch with his family.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It turns out he did go to the lunch for a little while. Whatever that means. Wherever he is. Whatever love means.

      Delete
    2. He went to the palace for a few minutes but he didnt go to the lunch. It said he went by way of the palace for 'logistcal' reasons'. It didn't sound like he spoke to anyone. Perhaps his car was in the leaving procession and they couldn't just peel off from it. I doubt he got out of the car because I saw the time he arrived at the airport and it was quick.

      Delete
  21. Yes, Cameron's wife's dress was 'cute' but not really dressy enough for a coronation IMO. Nice for a garden party, yes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True. But still, it looked like silk and she just looked like spring or summer.

      Delete
    2. Yes, she looked 'summery'. Cute. She did NOT, however, look like she was dressed to go to a serious event like The Coronation.

      Delete
    3. agree. i think she looked frumpy

      Delete
    4. I wouldn't go quite as far as to say 'frumpy''. She would have been fine for lunch at the beach or a picnic...ha!

      Delete
  22. Katy Perry's outfit bordered on a bit tacky for the occasion, but being a 'pop star' it wouldnt be unexpected. The same outfit could have been just a tiny bit modified and looked much better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree. I thought Perry's outfit was ghastly & inexpensive -looking, although of course it wasn't.

      Delete
    2. Trust me it wasn't inexpensive. Vivienne Westwood. I assume Katy wanted to honor an English designer. But she is a pop star so of course she dresses a little flamboyantly.

      Delete
    3. She could have worn something sophisticated, tasteful, elegant, but modern and REALLY set tongues wagging with the unexpectedness of it. But no, she sill chose the tacky rock star designer. I mean, I loved Vivienne, but Vivienne's dead-I grew up with her clothes.-I don't know who's churning them out now.

      Delete
  23. Great post Joni. Did you know Kates head piece was Alexander McQueen? Wasn't it just beautiful

    ReplyDelete
  24. "Jess Collett x Alexander McQueen headpiece with silver bullion, crystal and silver thread work three-dimensional leaf embroidery." I wish they would have worn tiaras. I like the diamonds!!!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Oh my goodness! Another astoundingly, informative and enjoyable post! Joni, how do you continually out do yourself??? Amazing. Thank you for all you do! Loved this!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Love the clothes, love the jewels, love the comments! Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Cynthia Taylor-LuceMay 9, 2023 at 11:21 AM

    As a Canadian who's been an avid follower of the royal family since the 1960's and has absorbed many books and articles and interviews over the years, I want to comment on your words about Prince Harry. He's seriously mentally ill, and in Meghan he found someone who has taken advantage of him and pursued a mother-type role to fulfill his need to replace his late mother. Both being disturbed people, the sum total of the pair has brought grief to the royal family and has made Harry's condition worse than ever. Nobody can trust him any more so nobody can speak to him without knowing their words (probably misquoted) will be made public by the gruesome twosome to wring money out of their media followers. Even at the coronation, under these circumstances, there was Harry getting paid to advertise Dior's suit he was wearing instead of proper English tailoring. He and Meghan wore microphones to eavesdrop on conversations at the Queen's memorial service, and that's why everyone avoided them.

    On another note, the monarchy is a long established institution in Britain. It would be unthinkable for Charles to say, oh it's modern times and I won't be King. I'll just go away and dabble around the garden. He fulfills a constitutional duty and he does it brilliantly. I'm all for tradition continuing, especially with the lovely family of William coming along for the future. I find it really irksome when Americans criticize the royal family when there is so much wrong with America. I'm honestly frightened for what the future of America, our nearest neighbour, will be if the craziness and lawlessness escalates further. I thought that common sense would prevail but the situation looks pretty dicey at the moment. And don't get me started on the guns and mass murders.

    I do appreciate all the lovely photos and most of the post! Just wanted to point out that Katie Perry is not wearing a pelmet! That's for windows! She's wearing a peplum-style jacket.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cynthia, Agree on pretty much everything you said about Harry the Petulent Prince.
      Also I'm American and America is in terrible shape right now, so I agree with you on that also. Crime is out of control and criminals are allowed to go wild in the streets, stealing everything out of stores with no prosecution. Crime is rampant and the district attorneys just let them go if they are even arrested in the first place. I'm so sad about my country right now.
      On another note lots of Americans love the royal family! They are actually quite popular with my friends and I. All we watch is British and Canadian tv in ourhouse...ha!
      Pelmet...ha! Gotta go now...Corrie iscoming on..Dont judge me!

      Delete
    2. You must listen to Candace Owens and Meghan Kelly - the conservative talk here and in England is that Meghan is his mother and she chose Harry because she knew she could manipulate him and become his mommy. What a load of ridiculousness. I can't even discuss anything Candace Owens or Kelly say about Meghan and Harry. Her latest diatribe against Taylor Swift says it all. ugh ugh ugh

      Delete
  28. Thanks so much for all of the pictures and explanations of 'who is who,' great job as always. As to feeling sorry for Harry, regardless of whether his book was accurate or not, he chose to step back and relinquish his role of service to the crown. Either continue to be part of the responsibilities and MANY privileges associated with representing the crown, or step back, go into private life without those privileges, and STAY out of the limelight .... he seems to want to have it both ways.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He has to sell his connection to Royal Family. How else would he make millions of dollars?

      Delete
    2. Love the post Joni and yes fashion is also design. In regards to the comments about Harry; he will never be allowed to live a private life. The paparazzi will always hound him and his family. As long as the scandal rags pay big bucks for photos and leaks the circus will continue. Don't forget the scandal also benefits the king ,the queen and William and Kate by keeping them in the news. Give Harry some grace and some time and let's see how it all shakes out. It will be interesting to follow.

      Delete
    3. Yes, they feed stories about Harry so people will not focus on the pedophile, Andrew.

      Delete
    4. Whether Andrew did anything or not, I don't know and I won't give my opinion of that here. However, look up the definition of pedophile. Everyone, everywhere is misusing the term.

      Delete
  29. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Joni, I love the fashion posts as YES fashion is definitely interior design. My take on Charlene (and Albert) was that she almost looked like she was trying to not be seen. So bland and reserved in colour and look. With her problems (being in the limelight) maybe she didn't want to stand out and be seen in a bright colour?

    ReplyDelete
  31. This post was fantastic, Joni. Thank you. Our son's graduation was the same day and while I got to see a bit of the beginning (while getting ready) I haven't had a chance to catch up on most of this. I enjoyed seeing all the fashion and jewels. As a life long follower of the British Royal family, I had mixed feelings about all of this. I grew up following Diana and couldn't help thinking of her. I agree that Charles and Camilla were clearly in love from the beginning but feel that Diana was truly too young and feed to the wolves....who could understand and try and deal with all that in your early twenties and without much support or guidance. I understand that Harry's decision to leave Royal duty means he doesn't have a roll, but isn't he still in line for the throne? He is still family and I really struggle to figure out why folks can't appreciate all that young man has been through and why he has done so much to protect his family. As you mentioned, Charles threw his family under the bus too...yet he was never relegated to the 3rd row. I also love that Harry left immediately to get back home to his son for his birthday.....I am guessing as good as a man as Charles has been for good causes...he wouldn't have left a ceremony early for his son's birthday or just to see them. I would have loved to be a fly on the wall to see how FLOTUS picked who got to attend with her...did they draw straws? arm wrestle? Lucky granddaughter! Where was Queen Maxima? She is my favorite........

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Harry is fifth in line for the throne. It's William then his three children then Harry. Harry will never be king.

      Delete
    2. Hopefully, My Lord.

      Delete
  32. I love that the blue and yellow dresses of Dr. Biden and her granddaughter formed the Ukrainian flag.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Another billion-plus was just approved for Ukraine. This is totally out of control at this point.

      Delete
    2. Um, what happens when Putin moves on to other parts of Europe? Oh, well, let him have it, right?

      Delete
    3. Ukraine is the most corrupt country in Europe. How many U.S. dollars do you think t-shirt man has squirreled away by now?

      Delete
    4. So unpatriotic!!! We the USA do not represent Ukraine. Enough of sending millions of tax payer dollar to them. Here in our country are people in need, Veterans are suffering!

      Delete
  33. Well, the King and Queen may not be the most handsome couple but I wish them well. I have to agree with you, the French president and his wife were truly the most tasteful and fashionable but do you think a bit underdressed for a royal coronation? Many of the others were a little too frumpy/matronly for me. You did a wonderful job of showing us and describing to us the Coronation. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The only reason, I believe that Mrs. French School Marm was underdressed is because she didn't wear a hat. She needed a hat!

      Delete
  34. Joni, your choices of photos and comments are wonderful and have added to my enjoyment of a spectacular day. For example, having a name for the anonymous Family members. I hope the monarchy continues for the Brits for another 1000 years as it can in many ways hold together a multi-cultural, multi-ethnic nation - perhaps, if politics doesn't destroy it. Finally, it seems to me that the Family handled a delicate situation in about as genteel and delicate a way as possible. Megan was to me a great disappointment because she could have been so great - a representative of ALL the brown and black skinned people of the Commonwealth! SHE could have been a link between them and the Crown. Terribly sad that bruised egos overrode thoughtfulness and, really, wisdom. There can be things in life more important than one's ego. A final thought: What were Elizabeth and Philip thinking when they named their son, a future king CHARLES???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What is wrong with the name Charles?

      Delete
    2. I think she is referring to Charles I and II - not great memories.

      Delete
  35. Very well said. Harry need has mental issues. As the wife of a combat veteran, I can see it clearly.

    ReplyDelete
  36. To Anon 8:20 AM
    Bravo!

    ReplyDelete
  37. agree completely. he's a spoiled little boy who's very jealous of his older brother and his wife. meghan was a very poor choice because she preyed on his insecurities. he needed a wife who would give him a swift kick instead of indulging his whining.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Bravo, Nashville Lady!

    ReplyDelete